Operational excellence improvement Card Image
Case study details

Operational excellence improvement

All graphical assets in this template are licensed for personal and commercial use. If you'd like to use a specific asset, please check the license below.

Key results from the engagement

21%
Overhead cost reduction
+6.8pts
EBITDA margin gain
12 month
Full engagement length
Client
Brannigan Component Supply

Where it started

Alderbrook had grown rapidly across multiple facilities, but its operational processes had not kept pace. Manual workflows, inconsistent reporting, and duplicated tasks were creating delays across key functions, while rising operating costs were putting pressure on margins.

The leadership team initially considered adding more resources to handle the growing workload. We suspected the real constraint was operational efficiency, not capacity — and the numbers backed that up.

What we did

We began with a full operational diagnostic — mapping core workflows, resource allocation, process bottlenecks, and performance metrics across the business. That analysis highlighted several areas where manual steps and fragmented processes were slowing execution and increasing costs.

In parallel, we identified $1.3M in operational inefficiencies — primarily from duplicated workflows, underutilized resources, and inconsistent processes — and built a streamlined operating model focused on automation, accountability, and measurable performance improvement.

“We knew we'd grown messy. We didn't know how much it was actually costing us until we could finally see it in one place.”
Operational excellence improvement

What changed

The operational improvements reduced production bottlenecks and improved throughput across the facility, while standardized workflows brought greater consistency to day-to-day operations. Combined with tighter inventory controls, operating margin improved from 11.4% to 19.6% over the engagement.

Efficiency gains that created lasting impact

The redesigned operating model reduced process inefficiencies and improved resource utilization across key production areas. Combined with workflow standardization and inventory optimization, EBITDA margin moved from 11.4% to 19.6% by the close of the engagement.

Services
Cost-to-serve modeling
Process consolidation
Financial systems
Performance management
Activity log
M01 :
Cost model built
M02 :
Duplicated functions identified
M03 :
Consolidation sequenced
M04 :
Back-office functions merged
M05 :
Case closed

Ready to take control of your financial success?

Get started now
Get started now
Button-icon-lightButton-icon-light
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.